Cricket Wireless to Become a National Carrier?

Cricket Wireless is known as one of the best pre-paid carriers in the country. However, this company serves 5.3 million prepaid customers in select communities in 25 states and it is projected to expand in the next few years. Well, Cricket Wireless may decide t enter the national scene in the near future.

Al Moschner, the executive vice president and chief operating officer of Cricket Wireless recently told Kent German of CNet that,

It's about national reach. An important part of our strategy is to become national. We're not going to stop building out our own infrastructure, but given that real growth in the industry is with prepaid users, we need to be a national carrier today. And more importantly, if you believe that a significant shift of sales is moving to a national carrier footprint, the only way for us to be relevant is to be national.

Moschner also talked about smartphones, music services, 4G plans and other endeavours.

Head on to CNet to read the entire interview.

That's it for this post. Stay tuned regularly to get more news on wireless networks.

Verizon Wireless Proposes Change to Existing Roaming Rule

Here's an interesting update to users who like to roam outside the confines of their carrier's wireless network. Verizon Wireless has offered a bold proposition to change the existing rules on roaming.

So why would Verizon Wireless propose the existing roaming rule? Well, pressure from the government has encouraged or forced the carrier to propose a change to the current laws regarding roaming.

Roaming is a term coined to describe a practice that involves extending of connectivity service in a location that is different from the home location where the service was registered.

The existing roaming law allows wireless network operators the choice to refuse from providing roaming services to competing companies that own spectrum in a given market but have yet to build out a network there. However, minor and regional wireless network operators claim that the existing roaming rule negatively affects customers, who are unable to roam in those regions and will be left without service.

Verizon Wireless announced that it will support legislation that requires it to provide roaming services in this type of circumstance. However, there's a catch. Big Red will only support legislation that sets a 2 year limit to the requirement.

So how will this play out? The letter containing the proposal to change the existing roaming rule has already been sent to several senators. However, considering how politics work, it may take months before actual changes to the rule are made.

That's it for this news on major wireless network operators. Tune in to this blog to get the latest news

AT&T and Verizon Wireless Anti-Competitive Practices Review

Trouble might be brewing for both AT&T and Verizon Wireless. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice has begun looking into large U.S. telecommunication companies such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. to see if any abuse of market power is happening.

Now, there is no cause for alarm. This process is still very much in its infancy and an actual investigation may not be even be opened. However, it is interesting to see that the government is looking into the matter. This tough stance by the DOJ appears to be a reflection of the Obama administration's aggressive stance on antitrust enforcement.

The AT&T and Verizon Wireless anti-competitive practice review seems to have originated from suspicions within the DOJ. Apparently, the massive growth achieved by these wireless network operators have led some to question if it might detrimental effects on smaller competitors and consumers.

Large wireless network operators like AT&T and Verizon Wireless have huge power and influence in the market, this means that they are capable of stifling their competition.

The AT&T and Verizon Wireless anti-competitive practice review will also focus on other areas like the exclusive handset deals. Some wireless network operators have exclusive rights to some high-end handsets and it might be prevent smaller carriers from offering a fair challenge. For instance, AT&T has the iPhone and Verizon Wireless has the BlackBerry Storm.

The DOJ is also looking into the limitations on what third-party companies can do using carriers' data networks. Allegedly, some wireless network operators are blocking certain media download and VoIP apps to prevent legitimate competition from rival services.

Well, I think this news is very interesting. An investigation would expose some unfair practices by the carriers. If there are any. I would really want the government to look at exclusive handset deals. Maybe it would lead a Verizon subscriber like me getting a CDMA iPhone.

That's it for this post on the AT&T and Verizon Wireless anti-competitive practice review. Tune in to this blog for more news and updates on wireless networks.